SCIoI member Rebecca Lazarides named among the 50 most productive researchers in educational psychology
A recognition in leading educational psychology journals
A recent study published in Frontiers in Psychology has identified SCIoI PI Rebecca Lazarides as one of the most productive researchers in top-tier, broad-scope educational psychology journals between 2017 and 2022. The paper, titled Identifying the 50 most productive researchers in top-tier, broad-scope educational psychology journals (2017–2022): a new perspective with a focus on publication trends and diversity, offers a broad view of publication activity in educational psychology and places Rebecca among a group of scholars whose work has helped shape the field in recent years.
The study focuses on articles published in six journals that the authors define as both top-tier and broad in scope: Educational Psychology Review, Educational Psychologist, Journal of Educational Psychology, Learning and Instruction, Journal of the Learning Sciences, and Contemporary Educational Psychology. The journals were selected through a systematic approach based on the Web of Science “Psychology, Educational” category and then narrowed down to journals that cover a broad range of educational psychology, rather than a specific subfield or population.
Because educational psychology is a wide and diverse field, ranging from motivation, learning and instruction to classroom processes, emotions, assessment, and educational technology, the recognition becomes particularly meaningful. A ranking based on these journals does not capture every possible form of academic contribution, but it does indicate strong visibility in central publication venues of the discipline.
How the study identified productivity
The paper used three different ways of assessing productivity. The first was count-based, counting the number of articles a researcher published in the selected journals. The second was point-based, giving different weight to author position and thereby taking into account whether a researcher appeared, for example, as first author, middle author, or last author. The third combined both approaches.
Rebecca appears in the point-based ranking, where she was placed 23rd, and in the combined ranking, where she was placed 38th. This distinction matters: her inclusion reflects not only the number of publications, but also her substantial role in the work included in the analysis.
The study also identifies Rebecca as an early-career researcher according to its own definition, which includes scholars who received their doctorate in 2013 or later. While the highest positions in the overall rankings are still dominated by long-established senior researchers, the paper also shows that a new generation of educational psychologists has become highly visible in leading journals. Rebecca’s inclusion in this group points to an academic profile that has developed with high clarity and consistency.
How this matters for SCIoI
The thematic analysis in the study also shows why Rebecca’s work is so relevant to SCIoI. Her publications in the analyzed journals are primarily associated with motivation, quantitative methods, and classroom processes. These topics sit at the intersection of educational psychology, educational science, motivational psychology, and cognitive psychology. They ask how learners develop interests, how they experience instruction, how classroom environments shape learning, and how teachers can support students not only cognitively, but also emotionally and motivationally.
At SCIoI, intelligence is not understood only as something that happens in the brain, in an algorithm, or in a robot. It is also studied as something that unfolds in interaction with the environment, with other agents, and with the structures that shape behavior and learning. Rebecca brings this perspective into the classroom. Her work investigates how instruction and feedback affect cognitive learning processes, intrinsic motivation, and attention, and how learning environments can be designed to better respond to individual learners.




