SCIoI member Rebecca Lazarides named among the 50 most productive researchers in educational psychology

Paper DOI →

A recognition in leading educational psychology journals

A recent study published in Frontiers in Psychology has identified SCIoI PI Rebecca Lazarides as one of the most productive researchers in top-tier, broad-scope educational psychology journals between 2017 and 2022. The paper, titled Identifying the 50 most productive researchers in top-tier, broad-scope educational psychology journals (2017–2022): a new perspective with a focus on publication trends and diversity, offers a broad view of publication activity in educational psychology and places Rebecca among a group of scholars whose work has helped shape the field in recent years.

The study focuses on articles published in six journals that the authors define as both top-tier and broad in scope: Educational Psychology Review, Educational Psychologist, Journal of Educational Psychology, Learning and Instruction, Journal of the Learning Sciences, and Contemporary Educational Psychology. The journals were selected through a systematic approach based on the Web of Science “Psychology, Educational” category and then narrowed down to journals that cover a broad range of educational psychology, rather than a specific subfield or population.

Because educational psychology is a wide and diverse field, ranging from motivation, learning and instruction to classroom processes, emotions, assessment, and educational technology, the recognition becomes particularly meaningful. A ranking based on these journals does not capture every possible form of academic contribution, but it does indicate strong visibility in central publication venues of the discipline.

How the study identified productivity

The paper used three different ways of assessing productivity. The first was count-based, counting the number of articles a researcher published in the selected journals. The second was point-based, giving different weight to author position and thereby taking into account whether a researcher appeared, for example, as first author, middle author, or last author. The third combined both approaches.

Rebecca appears in the point-based ranking, where she was placed 23rd, and in the combined ranking, where she was placed 38th. This distinction matters: her inclusion reflects not only the number of publications, but also her substantial role in the work included in the analysis.

The study also identifies Rebecca as an early-career researcher according to its own definition, which includes scholars who received their doctorate in 2013 or later. While the highest positions in the overall rankings are still dominated by long-established senior researchers, the paper also shows that a new generation of educational psychologists has become highly visible in leading journals. Rebecca’s inclusion in this group points to an academic profile that has developed with high clarity and consistency.

How this matters for SCIoI

The thematic analysis in the study also shows why Rebecca’s work is so relevant to SCIoI. Her publications in the analyzed journals are primarily associated with motivation, quantitative methods, and classroom processes. These topics sit at the intersection of educational psychology, educational science, motivational psychology, and cognitive psychology. They ask how learners develop interests, how they experience instruction, how classroom environments shape learning, and how teachers can support students not only cognitively, but also emotionally and motivationally.

At SCIoI, intelligence is not understood only as something that happens in the brain, in an algorithm, or in a robot. It is also studied as something that unfolds in interaction with the environment, with other agents, and with the structures that shape behavior and learning. Rebecca brings this perspective into the classroom. Her work investigates how instruction and feedback affect cognitive learning processes, intrinsic motivation, and attention, and how learning environments can be designed to better respond to individual learners.

For me, the classroom is a very important place to study intelligence,” says Rebecca. “It is where learning, motivation, feedback, attention, and social interaction come together in very concrete ways.

Rebecca’s recognition in the study is also a recognition of the importance of educational psychology within an interdisciplinary science of intelligence. Learning is one of the central processes through which intelligent behavior develops. But learning never happens in a vacuum. It happens in classrooms, in families, in interaction with teachers, peers, technologies, and social expectations. Rebecca’s research makes these contexts visible and shows how strongly they matter.

A path shaped by motivation, learning, and classrooms

Rebecca’s academic path shows a researcher who has built deep expertise in educational psychology while consistently opening her work to questions from neighboring fields.  She studied educational science at Freie Universität Berlin and completed her diploma in 2008. She then worked at Technische Universität Berlin at the chair of educational psychology, where she completed her doctorate in psychology in 2013 with a dissertation on students’ interest development. The dissertation already points to a question that continues to run through her work: why do students become interested in a subject, what role does socialization play for motivation, and how can educational environments support motivation rather than undermine it?

After a research stay at Monash University in Melbourne, Rebecca returned to Berlin and served as acting professor for Educational Psychology at TU Berlin from 2014 to 2016. In 2016, she was appointed Assistant Professor for School Pedagogy with a focus on school and instructional development at the University of Potsdam. Since 2021, she holds a  Full Professorship for School Pedagogy and Empirical Classroom Research (W3) at the University of Potsdam.

Today, Rebecca’s work spans several closely connected fields: school and instructional development, teaching quality, students’ affective and motivational development, heterogeneity in classroom contexts, gender-related educational disparities, digital media in schools, teacher education, teacher motivation, and the role of school and family as learning and developmental contexts. She is also active in several scientific and advisory roles, including as a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Brandenburg Ministry of Science, Research and Culture, and the Institute for School Quality of Berlin and Brandenburg. She is one of the editor-in-chiefs of Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft and on the international editorial advisory board of Learning and Instruction and Journal of Educational Psychology and serves as Third Vice President of the German Society for Empirical Educational Research (GEBF).

Learning with a good feeling

For Rebecca, learning is more than a cognitive process. It also involves confidence, interest, enjoyment and the conditions that make students want to keep going. Learners study better when they feel competent, when they understand the value of what they are doing, when they are not overwhelmed, and when learning can become meaningful to them. And motivation is one of the conditions under which learning can take place.

This shows in her work on intelligent tutoring systems and learning robots. Together with colleagues from computer science, Rebecca investigates how such systems might one day support students by responding to the motivational and emotional aspects of learning. The aim here is not to replace teachers at all. On the contrary, her work asks how technology can support teachers in dealing with the heterogeneity of real classrooms, where each student brings different interests, abilities, emotions, and needs.

 

In one possible future classroom, a student working on a mathematics task might receive support that takes into account whether they felt confident, frustrated, bored, or motivated. For Rebecca, this is one of her most important research question. Which phases of instruction are suitable for intelligent tutoring systems? Where do such systems help, and where are human teachers irreplaceable? How can educational technologies be designed in ways that are pedagogically meaningful rather than just technically impressive?

Intelligence in the classroom

These questions make Rebecca’s contribution to SCIoI very valuable. She brings intelligence research into one of the most consequential environments in society: the classroom. Her work connects models of learning with the lived realities of students and teachers. It asks how intelligent systems can be understood, designed, and evaluated in relation to human development, motivation, and education.

Being named among the most productive researchers in leading educational psychology journals highlights the strength and visibility of Rebecca’s research in a field that is central to understanding how people learn. It also shows how much SCIoI gains from researchers who bring intelligence science into dialogue with education, classrooms, and the social conditions of learning.

At SCIoI, Rebecca’s work shows that intelligence is about more than solving tasks. What also matters is how tasks are encountered, how feedback is received, how motivation is sustained, and how learning environments can help people develop their abilities. Her research shows that to understand intelligence, we also need to understand the conditions under which learners feel able, interested, supported, and ready to continue.


Research

An overview of our scientific work

See our Research Projects